9-11: What Really Happened?

 

As we approach the ten year anniversary of this tragic event in New York and Washington DC, it is becoming a bit easier to look back on the experience with less emotional attachment.  In light of the extensive work done by researchers, it is very clear that the official version of what happened that day does not account for an astonishing amount of visual, physical, and circumstantial evidence gathered to date.  Why can’t the evidence be accounted for?  What other possibilities are there?

Nearly two thousand professional architects and structural engineers have signed their names to a request for a new investigation to be opened as they are aware of several evidence unaccounted for in the government’s report on 9-11.  There are also countless eye-witnessed that attest to additional explosives and alternate time lines which disagree with what was presented to the world public.

The fact that there are so many unanswered questions from the original and subsequent official versions is unnerving in itself.  Why is there so much resistance to fully exploring what did or did not happen?  Why was all of the wreckage (and evidence) secured and removed so quickly and secretively?  Is there something to hide?  Was there an alternative agenda?  If so, what might it have been?

The implications are serious and deep.  If the truth of the events that day were to be different from the official story, what would that mean?  Who knew about it and when?  Can we trust the main stream media?  The  government?  Corporate America?  What else might be going on that we don’t know about?  Who benefited from the events that day and how?

There is no denying that thousands of people lost their lives that day and many hundreds of others were injured in the response, recovery, and clean-up phases.  My heart grieves to think that there could have been ulterior motives behind the attack beyond the simple story of middle-eastern terrorists hijacking airplanes and crashing them into selected targets.  But, that possibility seems more and more likely that deeper one looks into the evidence.